Right to Manage
What is the Right to Manage?
The Right to Manage (RTM) is a legal right that allows leaseholders in England and Wales to take over the management of their building from the freeholder — without needing to prove fault, go to court, or buy the freehold. It is established under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
If neighbours keep saying “we should look at Right to Manage,” it is often because something in the building has stopped working for the people who live there: repairs move slowly, service charge explanations feel opaque, and the incentives can feel stacked towards whoever appointed the agent — not necessarily towards you.
The Right to Manage (RTM) is a statutory right in England and Wales that allows qualifying leaseholders to take over the management of their building from the landlord or managing agent — without buying the freehold. If you want a quick sense of whether your building might be in scope, try the eligibility checker first — it only takes a few minutes.
What it means in practice
If you exercise RTM, responsibility for services such as maintenance, insurance and day-to-day running of the building can transfer to an RTM company formed by leaseholders. Ownership of the freehold does not change; this is about who runs the building, not who owns the land beneath it. It helps to separate a frustrating agent from a frustrating structure: sometimes the person is fine, but the setup still leaves leaseholders short of real control. Terms like “claim notice” crop up quickly — use our glossary if anything sounds unfamiliar.
RTM versus keeping your current arrangement
Where a managing agent serves the freeholder, their commercial relationship sits with the landlord even when you pay the service charge. Negotiating for a friendlier replacement can help at the margins, but it does not change who ultimately controls the appointment. RTM shifts that relationship: leaseholders own the RTM company, so whoever runs the building day to day answers to leaseholders rather than acting only as the freeholder's contractor.
RTM versus buying the freehold
Collective enfranchisement is about purchasing the freeholder's interest so leaseholders acquire full ownership of the structure and land subject to that process — usually more costly and involved than RTM, which is focused on management, not owning the bricks and freehold outright. Many groups choose RTM first because it is typically faster and cheaper to reach day-to-day control; enfranchisement can remain a later goal if the building still wants it. The two routes are not mutually exclusive.
Legal basis
RTM was introduced under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The rules set out who can qualify, how notices are served, and what happens if the statutory conditions are met. In broad terms, you are either in scope and can follow the defined steps, or you are not — there is less room for “maybe” than an informal agreement. This site summarises those rules in plain English; it does not replace the legislation or professional advice. For first-pass criteria, check if your building qualifies; for a longer walkthrough, see our RTM process overview.
Who RTM is for
RTM needs at least one leaseholder willing to coordinate, enough neighbours to meet the participation thresholds, and a group prepared to form and run an RTM company — it is not something you subscribe to passively. Everyone does not have to dive in from day one, but somebody does need to take the organisational lead, and the law sets minimum levels of backing before you can complete the claim.
What RTM is not
- It is not the same as collective enfranchisement (buying the freehold) — see above for how they differ.
- It does not guarantee a particular managing agent or outcome — it is a structured process with fixed steps.
- It is not a substitute for legal, surveying or financial advice where you need it.
After acquisition
Once RTM succeeds, leaseholders steer the RTM company. Many groups retain a managing agent but appoint on their own terms — retendering when performance slips — while others prefer to self-manage aspects of the block and buy in accountants or caretaking only where useful. Conversations sometimes mention savings in the region of forty to fifty per cent compared with historic spend; outcomes really do vary by building, contracts, and how transparently work is procured. What is consistent is that decisions sit with people who live there.
Taking the next step
The formal route runs through prescribed notices and waiting periods. Read how the process works for the sequence, use the notice templates wizard when you are ready to draft paperwork for your building, and keep the handbook-style guide open as a reference while you plan dates and neighbour conversations.
Frequently asked questions
Short answers for orientation only — not tailored to your leases.
Do I need a solicitor to do RTM?
Should I use a solicitor at all?
What is the Right to Manage in one sentence?
Do we need to prove mismanagement?
We only have a small block — can we still do RTM?
What if I feel overwhelmed?
Educational use only. RightToManage.com provides general information to help leaseholders understand RTM. It is not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to a qualified professional. Read our disclaimer.